Reachy vs Linked Helper (2026): Two Local Tools, Two Generations

Chris — Founder, Reachy ·

TL;DR: Linked Helper deserves credit — it showed years ago that automation running on your own computer is the safe way to do LinkedIn outreach. Reachy shares that local-first architecture and adds what came after: signal-based sourcing, AI writing with your own key, lead scoring and a modern interface.

Quick comparison

ReachyLinked Helper
Where it runsYour machine, your IPYour machine, your IP
PricingFree → $39/mo~$15–45/mo
Lead sourcingSignals: posts, groups, followers, Slack, eventsSearch pages, some events/groups
AI messagingGPT-5, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini — your key, 0% markupTemplate variables
Lead scoring / ICP fitBuilt inNot available
Learning curveGuided, campaign funnel UINotoriously steep
Free plan14-day trial + free monitoring14-day trial

Where Linked Helper shines

It’s cheap, battle-tested, and its action library is enormous — if you can climb the learning curve, you can script almost any LinkedIn action. Power users who enjoy configuring every knob still swear by it.

Where Reachy is different

Reachy assumes the tool should do the thinking. Instead of assembling action chains, you point it at a signal — a competitor’s post, a Slack community, a creator’s followers — and it builds the list, scores every contact against your ICP, writes personalized messages with GPT-5, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini (your key, 0% markup), and runs the sequence with warm-up and safe limits. One funnel view shows people → invited → connected → contacted → good fit → goal.

Same safety architecture; a generation apart in what the tool does for you.

Which should you choose?

  • Choose Linked Helper if you want the lowest price and enjoy building automation chains yourself.
  • Choose Reachy if you want the same local safety with an agent that sources, scores and writes for you — starting free.

Download Reachy free and compare the setup time: first campaign in minutes, not evenings.